Wage dynamics parameters (wage_p, wage_q)
Table of contents
Overview
These parameters govern the dynamics of wage adjustment in the G-Cubed model. They determine how wages respond to expected inflation and labor market conditions, implementing a Phillips curve relationship that captures the trade-off between inflation and unemployment.
Parameters
wage_p
SYM Declaration:
parameter wage_p(regions) 'exp infl weight in wage equation'
Definition: The weight on expected inflation in the wage equation. This parameter determines how much wages respond to expected future inflation versus past realized inflation.
Calibration: Default value: 0.4
# Employment parameter in the wage equation
WAGE_P: float = 0.4
Usage in Model: Used in the wage dynamics equation:
lead(WAGE) = WAGE
+ wage_p*(lead(PRCT) - PRCT + PRXX)
+ (1-wage_p)*(PRCT-PRCL)
+ wage_q*(ln(LABO) - ln(LABX))
Where:
wage_p*(lead(PRCT) - PRCT + PRXX): Expected inflation component(1-wage_p)*(PRCT-PRCL): Past inflation component
wage_q
SYM Declaration:
parameter wage_q(regions) 'employment parameter in wage equation'
Definition: The sensitivity of wage growth to labor market tightness. This parameter determines how much wages respond to deviations of actual employment from trend employment.
Calibration: Default value: 0.35
# Expected inflation weight in the wage equation
WAGE_Q: float = 0.35
Usage in Model: Used in the wage dynamics equation:
lead(WAGE) = WAGE
+ wage_p*(lead(PRCT) - PRCT + PRXX)
+ (1-wage_p)*(PRCT-PRCL)
+ wage_q*(ln(LABO) - ln(LABX))
Where:
LABO: Actual labor supply/employmentLABX: Trend or natural level of employmentln(LABO) - ln(LABX): Employment gap (log deviation)
Wage Equation Structure
The wage equation can be written as:
\[W_{t+1} = W_t + \pi^e + \gamma (L_t - L^*)\]Expanding the inflation expectations:
\[W_{t+1} = W_t + \alpha \cdot E_t[\pi_{t+1}] + (1-\alpha) \cdot \pi_t + \gamma (L_t - L^*)\]Where:
- $W_t$: Wage level (logged)
- $\alpha$:
wage_p(weight on expected inflation) - $\pi^e$: Expected inflation
- $\pi_t$: Current/past inflation
- $\gamma$:
wage_q(employment sensitivity) - $L_t - L^*$: Employment gap
Economic Interpretation
Inflation Expectations (wage_p)
- Higher
wage_p(more forward-looking):- Wages respond more to expected future inflation
- Inflation expectations become self-fulfilling faster
- More rapid adjustment to monetary policy changes
- Can lead to faster disinflation if expectations are anchored
- Lower
wage_p(more backward-looking):- Wages respond more to past realized inflation
- Inflation is more persistent
- Slower adjustment to policy changes
- Greater inflation inertia
Labor Market Tightness (wage_q)
- Higher
wage_q:- Steeper Phillips curve
- Wages more sensitive to employment conditions
- Stronger link between output gaps and inflation
- Faster wage adjustment to demand shocks
- Lower
wage_q:- Flatter Phillips curve
- Wages less responsive to employment
- Weaker output-inflation trade-off
- More stable wages despite employment fluctuations
Phillips Curve Interpretation
The wage equation implements an expectations-augmented Phillips curve:
\[\Delta W = \pi^e + \gamma (U^* - U)\]Where unemployment is inversely related to employment:
- When
LABO > LABX(tight labor market): wages rise faster - When
LABO < LABX(slack labor market): wage growth slows
Policy Implications
Monetary Policy
wage_paffects the speed of disinflation- Higher
wage_pallows faster inflation control if credibility is established - Lower
wage_prequires more persistent policy to anchor expectations
Labor Market Policy
wage_qdetermines the output cost of disinflation- Higher
wage_qmeans larger unemployment impact from contractionary policy - Lower
wage_qallows more “painless” disinflation
Related Variables
| Variable | Description |
|---|---|
WAGE | Wage rate (logged) |
PRCT | Consumer price index (logged) |
PRCL | Lagged consumer price index |
PRXX | Expected inflation shock |
LABO | Actual labor/employment |
LABX | Trend/natural employment |
G-Cubed